For storing FSLogix profile containers with geo-redundancy in Azure Virtual Desktop, which storage solution is recommended?

Disable ads (and more) with a premium pass for a one time $4.99 payment

Study for the Azure Virtual Desktop Exam AZ-140. Prepare with flashcards and multiple choice questions. Each question includes hints and explanations. Get ready for your exam!

Using Azure Files for storing FSLogix profile containers with geo-redundancy in Azure Virtual Desktop is a recommended solution due to its built-in capabilities for file sharing and elasticity specifically designed for cloud environments. Azure Files offers fully managed file shares in the cloud that can be easily accessed via SMB (Server Message Block), making it suitable for caching FSLogix profiles.

The geo-redundancy aspect of Azure Files is particularly important for maintaining profile data availability even in the event of regional outages. With the proper configuration, Azure Files can provide redundancy across multiple regions, ensuring that user profiles are reliable and accessible from different Azure Virtual Desktop instances.

Moreover, Azure Files supports integration with Active Directory, enabling seamless authentication for users accessing their profile containers. This is crucial for centralized user profile management in a virtual desktop scenario, enhancing performance and reducing latency.

In contrast, the other options may not provide the same level of integration, redundancy, or ease of use for FSLogix profile management. Azure Data Share focuses primarily on data sharing across organizations rather than file services. Azure NetApp Files, while high-performing, is often more complex to manage and can be more costly, making it less ideal for simple profile storage needs. Lastly, Storage Spaces Direct is a solution

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy